Security and Privacy designs¶
In order to provide you with the best reusable information when creating your designs, this section outlines some key design blueprints and must do tips when creating solutions.
Handling privacy regulations¶
This section outlines simple and effective ways for handling privacy requirements within your solution architecture. An important document that is input for privacy requirements for European Citizens is the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But other manany other countries have comparable regulations with comparable design problems.
What is the GDPR?¶
Privacy, security, Internet and IT systems are complex and form a toxic mix. Many things can and will go wrong. Often it is just a manner of time before real incidents happen. Since detection of privacy and security breaches is also non trivial to accomplish there is a great chance you will never known that your data is seen or copied by unauthorized persons. Privacy is a core value of individuals of democratic societies.
Tracking people without their knowledge, approval or a court order is just flat-out wrong. The fact that it can be done is no excuse. Without adtech, and massive data collection of commercial companies, the EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) would never have happened. The GDPR should put a hold to this practice. But the GDPR is no silver bullet. Many escapes are possible and without good security controls privacy can not exist.
The new EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will become fully enforceable throughout the European Union . This regulation is an important change in data privacy regulation for every company who deals with EU individuals.
Security and privacy can never be done correct afterwards. So you must design or redesign your information systems and take security and privacy as top requirements to reduce risks.
What is personal information¶
The European data protection law defines personal data as any information about a living individual who could be identified from that data, either on its own or when combined with other information.
So personal data is any information that relates to an identified or identifiable living individual. Different pieces of information that can lead to the identification of a particular person, also constitute as personal data.
This means that MAC addresses, IP addresses are data pieces that are defined as personal data under the GDPR. But since the GDPR is not specific on details you will not find terms like MAC address or IP address explicitly stated in the GDPR document.
Having an IP address and MAC address will not mean that you can easily identify a natural person. Most of the time information e.g. from ISPs or local network administrators is needed to determine the real individual behind an IP address.
There is also a classification called ‘sensitive personal data’, which means any information concerning an individual’s
- Racial or ethnic origin
- Political opinions,
- Religious or philosophical beliefs,
- Trade union membership,
- Health data,
- Genetic data,
- Biometric data,
- Sex life or sexual orientation,
- Past or spent criminal convictions.
Design rules for privacy design¶
Design rules to do privacy by design good from the start are:
- No security = no privacy. Dead simple. You can never do privacy correct if security is hardly implemented.
- Use an open design. The security and privacy should not depend on secrecy of the design and implementation. This accounts for your core IT systems, but also for your control and management systems. So go for real open.
- Defensive data collection. Only collect data that is really needed. Limiting data collection and (long term)storage prevents risks on data leakage.
- Reduce IT complexity. Besides high cost for maintenance and change, complexity can lead to severe risks that can impact security, privacy and safety for humans.
Storing privacy data¶
Storing personal data or private data of others is always an issue.
The GDPR answer on how to store personal data is by using “appropriate technical and organisational safeguards”. So you are screwed. IT consultants, auditors and lawyers know this and will try to convince you that the only way to answer this question is to do extensive (and expensive) risks assessments. Solid technical knowledge on how data is really stored within systems, databases, clouds, is scarce. So you will be forced to invest a lot of time doing business and organizational risks assessments and spend less time on evaluating important technical risks that come with open or closed IT technologies.
The simplest and best answer to the question is: Do not collect and store personal data.
On the technical solution level you will discover that you almost always need solution building blocks that will meet functionality like:
- Identity and access management
- (Secure)Data Storage
- Logging and auditing
You should use separate solution building blocks and make sure that when one will fail the personal data storage is still safe. So use principles like “Defense in depth” and compartmentalise among other crucial security principles.
The perfect simple secure “Data Storage” as simple technical answer for storing personal information does not exist. But smart is to standardize your IT landscape where possible by making use of reusable Solution Building Blocks (SBB’s). This prevents you from reinventing the wheel for every new GDPR challenge.
Encrypting data at rest (so storing data) provides an effective protection against unauthorized or unlawful processing. It is especially effective to protect data against unauthorized access if the device storing the encrypted data is lost or stolen.
Below some tips for using (secure) solution building blocks for storing personal data, think of using:
- Make use of database encryption (All OSS databases support this perfectly, e.g. PostgreSQL, MariaDB , MongoDB)
- Make use of file system encryption or storage device encryption
- Make use of a secure Vault for the uttermost important secret information (Solid OSS implementations exist, like Hashicorp Vault )
- Make use a fancy new blockchain technology enabled storage protocol. But mind: You MUST known what you are doing, since (secure)storage of data on a blockchain does not make it private by and compliant for GDPR usage by default.
Permanent erasing of data¶
The GDPR introduces a right for individuals to have personal data erased. This right to erasure is also known as ‘the right to be forgotten’. This means that individuals can make a request for erasure verbally or in writing. This rule is outlined in article 17 of the GDPR, but the technical consequences and complexity that comes with this rule are not trivial to implement. And a clear answer for implementation is not present in the GDPR. So even deletion is risk based.
From a technical point of view real and permanent erasing of data is a real challenge!
Using a standard delete function from a database or operating system hardly will remove data. There are great ways to get data back after administrator errors or disasters. Deleted data is often still recoverable. So simply using a ‘delete’ doesn’t meet the GDPR compliance for erasure. Besides were do you start when deleting data? Data is often shared with suppliers, partners, resellers. But data is also transfered to various marketing companies or even sold. And data is also often stored on various on-line or off-line backups facilities. And do not forget to check if data that must be erased is present on log and audit files.
So to guarantee that data is deleted from all these different players is in practice hard to realize. Of course the key is not to share or sell gathered data in the first place, but this is not always possible. Some options are:
- If you have encrypted personal data an option for erasure is to use crypto-shredding. This is the practice of ‘deleting’ data by overwriting the encryption keys. However there can be consequences for data you do not want to delete if you are destroying your encryption keys.
- Use certified data erasure software. Data erasure software should comply with requirements to erase hidden areas, provide a defects log list and list bad sectors that could not be overwritten. Standards and rules for deleting data for various industries (e.g. health care and military) exist for many years already. Make reuse of this standards and rules to implementation of the GDPR easier. But erasing a data collection is often easier that only deleting a single record.
If data is or was available on the Internet, intended or unintended, is will be close to impossible to delete.
Pseudonymization or Anonymization¶
Determining how to handle the GDPR is not straightforward when dealing with data masking. A question relevant to comply with the GDPR is if you should use:
- Anonymization or
To mask personal data in your IT landscape.
According to the GDPR ‘pseudonymization’ means the processing of personal data in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information, provided that such additional information is kept separately and is subject to technical and organizational measures to ensure that the personal data are not attributed to an identified or identifiable natural person. So Pseudonymization is a method to substitute identifiable data with a reversible, consistent value. So the weakness is that personal data is still there, only a bit more difficult to get if you have no information on the used pseudonymization rules.
Pseudonymization of personal data can reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and help controllers and processors to meet GDPR obligations. But pseudonymization of data is in general a weak process to protect data privacy. Pseudonymization substitutes only the identity of the data subject in such a way that additional information is required to re-identify the data subject. A better approach to protect private data is to use data anonymization.
Data anonymization is the process of either encrypting or removing personally identifiable information from data sets, so that the private personal data remain anonymous. Real anonymization is irreversibly and destroys permanent any option of identifying the data subject.
Using pseudonymization introduces a large number of risks that are not present when using anomyzation. However in some use cases you can only use pseudonymization. But use it with care, since the technical and organizational risks involved with pseudonymization are significant.
Privacy Threat Modeling¶
To design systems with a low risk profile for privacy and security risks a good tool is to use thread modeling.
A privacy threat model is a way of looking at privacy risks in order to identify what threats to privacy (and security) exist for your situation. Some common privacy threats are:
- Surveillance. Surveillance is the observation or monitoring of an individual’s communications or activities.
- Stored Data Compromise. Systems that do not take adequate measures to secure data from unauthorized or inappropriate access expose a high risk for privacy.
- Intrusion. Intrusion consists of invasive acts that disturb or interrupt one’s digital activities. E.g. network intrusion (on your digital communication) or video / audio intrusion to follow what you do.
Creating a dedicated privacy thread model is always recommended. Of course you should make use of general existing thread models (e.g. the STRIDE model) and tailor it for your specific situation. In essence creating a threat model is creating answers to the following questions:
- What do you want to protect? (E.g. What data, what kind of communication, what can be misused?)
- Who do you want to protect it from? (E.g. What people, which organizations, criminal actors etc.)
- How likely is it that you will need to protect it? (Your personal level of exposure to those threats.)
- How bad are the consequences if protection fails?
- How much trouble are you willing to go through in order to try to prevent against these threads? (E.g. cost/ money, time and convenience, loss of flexibility, etc )
Depending your domain, context and specific use case you should make use of thread models and measurements against common threads that are already invented by others. E.g. if you are a journalist, make use of thread models and tools that are already developed for you. And if you use an open model, make sure your improvements can again help others.
Fingerprinting is a solid technique for retrieving information. This can be information of systems but also persons. From a privacy and security perspective knowing how easily fingerprinting is gives input for better security and privacy measurements.
Device fingerprinting or browser fingerprinting is systematic collection of information about a remote device, for identification purposes. With the ultimate goal: To identify you as person and sell you things.
Fingerprinting techniques are so good nowadays that asking for user login name with user credentials is more error prone than identifying an user by using advanced fingerprinting techniques. Fingerprinting is stateless and transparent for the user. Any third-party interested in fingerprinting can still get some piece of information of you.
Everything you use to make a network connection is vulnerable for network fingerprinting tools. E.g. TCP/IP stack fingerprinting can be used to identify types of systems and used network configurations.
Average users are of course not aware of fingerprinting techniques used. But to give you some information on what information is (easily) retrievable when you visit a web site:
- Type of browser
- Color Depth used
- Screen Resolution
- Information on browser session storage
- Information if a browser has IE specific ‘AddBehavior’
- CPU class of your machine
- Platform (Operating system)
- DoNotTrack settings enabled in your browser
- Full list of installed fonts (maintaining their order, which increases the entropy)
- Information on Plugins (IE included)
- Information on AdBlockers installed
- Information if the user has tampered with its languages settings in the browser
- Information if the user has tampered with its screen resolution in the browser
- Information if the user has tampered with its OS settings
- Information if the user tampered with its browser settings
- Touch screen detection and capabilities
- Pixel Ratio
- Number of logical processors available to the user browser or device
- Device memory
- Microphone, Camera (in use, present etc)
And this list is not even complete. Storing this information or pieces of this information will expose some of your privacy. Various researchers have shown that the accuracy to identify users using only finger printing technique is highly accurate. Even better than user a password or two phase authentication.
Using tools like Fingerprint2 (see OSS Privacy Applications.) within your Secure Software Development Life Cycle Processes will minimize the risks that third party service providers you use for your Internet facing systems (rich websites) are a risk for your GDPR compliance efforts. If you have a good valid reason to use fingerprinting techniques to identify your users you should ask for permission from your users if you want to meet the GDPR.
Despite the fact that the GDPR document starts with “The protection of natural persons in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right” it is very hard for users and service provides to protect these rights. This because making it impossible to trace communication by third parties, including governments is very difficult. Most governments are still not very kind for persons with other principles. So there is a real need to make it possible to make tracing of communication impossible without throwing giving away all the benefits of current Internet communication technologies.
Using secure communication (e.g. VPN , HTTPS ) is almost a must have to be GDPR compliant. Encrypting data whilst it is being transferred from one device to another provides effective protection against interception of the communication by a third party whilst the data is in transfer.
There are some good FOSS tools available to protect your privacy if you have a hostile government and must protect your communication. E.g. take a look at Streisand, but a full list can be found in the section ‘OSS Privacy Applications’
Dealing with metadata¶
To meet the GDPR requirements you should be aware of the risk of exposing personal information by metadata in documents. So make use of metada anonymisation.
Metadata is data that consists of information that characterizes data (e.g. Word documents, pictures, music files, etc). In essence, metadata answers who, what, when, where, why, and how about every facet of the data that is being characterized. Metadata within a file can contain a lot of privacy related data. Office documents like pdf or MSOffice automatically add author, company information and revision information(e.g. who changed what) to documents and spreadsheets. Under the GDPR you are not by default allowed to disclose this metadata information on the web.
When you distribute information or publish information on the Internet you must check if metadata in document is still present and if you are allowed to expose this information. In most cases you do not want the metadata exposed. To solve this problem a lot of tools exist that claim to strip all metadata for you from Office Documents (MSWord, PDF, etc). However in most cases these tools work far from perfect and give you a false feeling of security. For examples, images embedded inside PDF documents may not be cleaned and images also contain metadata information.
From a GDPR perspective you must be sure that no metadata is present by accident in documents you publish. So before publishing documents you should convert documents to a format that do not contain any metadata at all: E.g. plain-text document. But be aware and very careful: every format can be watermarked, so also even plain text documents! E.g. by using white space steganography. Steganography is the science of concealing messages in other messages. In this digital age with a lot of companies and governments following your communication, steganography provides still a good way for hiding messages.
Specific GDRP References¶
The only official EC site regarding the GDPR. Note that a lot of sites pretend to be official EC sites, but are setup by commercial companies! https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
The GDPR official text: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN
How do I apply privacy by design¶
Privacy by design refers to principles that must be applied for all systems where in potential private data is captured or processed. Article 25 of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) states that data protection by design is mandatory. However in applying this in practice can be hard. But as with all challenges within security and privacy good design rules have been developed.
A good practical guide for implementing privacy by design is created by Enisa: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-and-data-protection-by-design
A nice overview of privacy design patterns can be found at https://privacypatterns.org/patterns/
How do I manage API security¶
For APIs that will be able to transport private or secure information a risk assessment should be completed. Be aware that APIs are part of the whole system, but for inboud or outbound APIs examing the information that will be transported by an API is a good start.
API Provider security controls are typically provided by a proxy or api-gateway. This because all traffic towards API end points is than centrally managed. You can of course also decentralize this, but than make sure all containers configurations are automatically provisioned. Minimum API controls should be:
- API key Authorisation (*)
- OAuth Authentication (*)
- Request Rate Limiting
- Logging & Realtime Analytics
- Threat Protection
- Transport Security
- Good API key security requires use of a vault.
- Established continuous code review processes
- Use of a ‘soft identifier’ or tag to enable tracking and analytics of the API
(* if you offer protected services)
How do I validate a password?¶
A common way to validate the password strength is to check it against dictionaries. If you want to take your password validation to the limit there are multiple list in the open domain available that you can use.
A nice collection of password lists can be found at: https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists/tree/master/Passwords
In this passwords directory you can find a number of password lists that can be used by multiple tools when attempting to guess credentials for a given targeted service.
What are good privacy design patterns?¶
A nice and proven way to speed up creating a privacy architecture or design challenges is to use design patterns. Good reusable solutions for applying ‘Privacy-by-design’ in your architecture and implementation activities can increase the speed of creating and improve the quality of your IT solution. However many documents that have a title ‘Privacy-by-design’ and claim to help you with this architecture challenge do little more than giving a summary of all the GDPR rules and principles that must be taken into account. So these kind of documents give you little help when you are looking a way for speeding up your ‘Privacy-by-design’ challenge.
Privacy patterns can be regarded as partial solutions to common privacy problems. So when you are facing privacy design challenges a good way is to find a number of good small solutions and glue these together.
A very good and rich collection of privacy design patterns can be found on: https://privacypatterns.org/patterns/ E.g. you can find here privacy design patterns for:
- Use of dummies
- Data Breach Notification Pattern
- Layered Policy Design
- Strip Invisible Metadata and many more!
All these patterns are developed as mini ‘design solutions’ to common privacy problems. Using these privacy patterns is an easy and practical way to solve ‘privacy-by-design’ challenges within small and large organizations.
Adding new privacy patterns to this collection is open for all, since this ‘Privacy Patterns’ project is an open project. Check https://github.com/privacypatterns if you want to contribute.
This document is a reference to open security and privacy information to speed up creation of solution architectures. So the https://privacypatterns.org/patterns/ is the open resource to look for privacy patterns. This site has a nice friendly UX what minimize the time needed for finding the right privacy pattern.
How to handle privacy when designing new protocol specifications?¶
When using Internet based protocols you should use RFC 6973 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6973). This document offers guidance for developing privacy considerations for inclusion in protocol specifications. It aims to make designers,implementers, and users of Internet protocols aware of privacy-related design choices. This RFC offers always good guidelines and makes you aware of the key privacy threats that any protocol designer should know.
How to build the Internet yourself?¶
The internet has become a tracking machine. It has evolved to track you. Besides your local (business)network you are tracked by the large Internet network, corporations, and governments. Everything that can be measured is tracked. So why not build a better Internet, a non tracking network by default?
You do not need censorship or surveillance. Surveillance is the monitoring of behavior, activities. Building decentralized networks has been done and will be done more. Besides building a network to get more privacy when needed most part of the world still do not have Internet at all. So building networks to share knowlegde e.g. about privacy and censorship is always a good investment.
Check the manual at: https://bm-support.org/pdfdocs/how_to_build_the_internet.pdf
This manual is also an very good and readable document to gain more knowledge on how Internet really works.